1. Monette DR, Sullivan TJ, DeJong CR, Hilton TP.Applied Social Research: A Tool for the Human Services. 9th ed. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole; 2013.

2. Neuman WL. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 7th ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications; 2009.

3. Drisko J. Split or synthesis: the odd relationship between clinical practice and research in social work and in social work education. Clinical Social Work Journal. 2014;42(2):182-192.

4. Papadopoulos I, Lees S. Developing culturally competent researchers. J Adv Nurs. 2002;37(3):258-264.

5. Gruman JC. Basic vs. applied research: finding a balance. Chron Higher Educ. 2003;49(29):B20.

6. Lutzker JR, Tymchuk AJ, Bigelow KM. Applied research in child maltreatment: practicalities and pitfalls. Child Serv Soc Policy Res Pract. 2001;4(3):141-156.

7. Berragan L. Nursing practice draws upon several different ways of knowing. J Clin Nurs. 1998;7(3):209-217.

8. Carper BA. Fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1978;1(1):12-23.

9. Johns C. Framing learning through reflection within Carper's fundamental ways of knowing in nursing. J Adv Nurs. 1995;22(2):226-234.

10. Eisengart SP, Faiver CM. Intuition in mental health counseling. J Ment Health Couns. 1996;18(1):41-52.

11. Schon DA. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1983.

12. Basford L, Slevin O. Theory and Practice of Nursing: An Integrated Approach to Caring Practice. 2nd ed. London: Campion Press Ltd; 2003.

13. Munhall PL. Nursing Research: A Qualitative Perspective. 5th ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Learning; 2012.

14. Clark AJ. Empathy: implications of three ways of knowing in counseling. J Hum Couns Educ Dev. 2004;43(2):141-151.

15. Yegidis BL, Weinbach RW, Myers LL. Research Methods for Social Workers. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Pearson; 2017.

16. Crossan F. Research philosophy: towards an understanding. Nurse Res. 2003;11(1):46-55.

17. Ponterotto JG. Qualitative research in counseling psychology: a primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science. J Couns Psychol. 2005;52(2):126-136.

18. Proctor S. Linking philosophy and method in the research process: the case for realism. Nurse Res. 1998;5(4):73-90.

19. Cody WK. Philosophical and Theoretical Perspectives for Advanced Nursing Practice. 5th ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2011.

20. Onwuegbuzie AJ. Why can't we all get along? Towards a framework for unifying research paradigms. Education. 2002;122(3):518-531.

21. Borland KW. Qualitative and quantitative research: a complementary balance. N Dir Instit Res. 2001;112:5-13.

22. Boulos P, Rajacich D. Critical theory as a philosophical base for nursing science. Guidance Couns. 2003;19(1):37-44.

23. Roy C, Jones DA. Nursing Knowledge Development and Clinical Practice. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company; 2007.

24. Sorrell JH. The pleasure of dissent: a critical theory of psychotherapy as an emancipatory practice. Am J Psychother. 2006;60(2):131-145.

25. Crotty M. The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2003.

26. Harding SH. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1991.

27. Stanley L (ed). Feminist Praxis: Research, Theory and Epistemology in Feminist Sociology. New York, NY: Routledge; 2014.

28. Ackerly B, True J. Doing Feminist Research in Political and Social Science. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan; 2010.

29. Campbell JC, Bunting S. Voices and paradigms: perspectives on critical and feminist theory in nursing. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1991;13(3): 1-15.

30. American Sociological Association. The Importance of Collecting and Doing Social Scientific Research on Race. Available at https://www.asanet.org/sites/default/files/savvy/images/press/docs/pdf/asa_race_statement.pdf. Last accessed February 15, 2024.

31. Padilla AM. Hispanic Psychology: A 25-Year Retrospective Look. Available at https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1025&context=orpc. Last accessed February 15, 2024.

32. Tillman LC. Culturally sensitive research approaches: an African-American perspective. Educ Res. 2002;31(9):3-12.

33. Dillard CB. The substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen: examining an endarkened feminist epistemology in educational research and leadership. Int J Qualitative Stud Educ. 2000;13(6):661-681.

34. Palafox NA, Buenconsejo-Lum L, Riklon S, Waitzfelder B. Improving health outcomes in diverse populations: competency in cross-cultural research with indigenous Pacific islander populations. Ethn Health. 2002;7(4):279-285.

35. Rogler LH. The meaning of culturally sensitive research in mental health. Am J Psychiatry. 1989;146(3):296-303.

36. Becerra RM, Zambrana RE. Methodological approaches to research on Hispanics. Soc Work Res Abstr. 1985;21(2):42-49.

37. Bussing R, Koro-Ljungberg ME, Gary F, Mason DM, Garvan CW. Exploring help-seeking for ADHD symptoms: a mixed methods approach. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2005;13(2):85-101.

38. Holroyd E, Twinn S, Adab P. Issues and innovations in nursing practice: socio-cultural influences on Chinese women's attendance for cervical screening. J Adv Nurs. 2004;46(1):42-52.

39. National Research Council. Understanding Violence Against Women. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996.

40. Marin G, Marin VB. Research with Hispanic Populations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1991.

41. Yick AG, Berthold SM. Conducting research on violence in Asian American communities: methodological issues. Violence Vict. 2005;20(6):661-677.

42. Hughes D, Seidman E, Williams N. Cultural phenomena and the research enterprise: toward a culturally anchored methodology.Am J Community Psychol. 1993;21(6):687-703.

43. Mertens DM. Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2015.

44. Suyemoto KL. Redefining "Asian American" identity: reflections on differentiating ethnic and racial identities for Asian American individuals and communities. In: Zhan L (ed). Asian Americans: Vulnerable Populations, Model Interventions, and Clarifying Agendas. Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett; 2002: 195-231.

45. Lee MY, Law PFM. Perception of sexual violence against women in Asian American communities. J Ethnic Cult Diversity Soc Work. 2001;10(2):3-25.

46. Kennedy MA, Gorzalka BB. Asian and non-Asian attitudes toward rape, sexual harassment, and sexuality. Sex Roles. 2002;46(7/8):227-238.

47. Bui HN. Help-seeking behavior among abused immigrant women: a case of Vietnamese American women. Violence Against Women. 2003;9(2):207-239.

48. Yoshioka MR, DiNoia J, Ullah, K. Attitudes toward marital violence: an examination of four Asian communities. Violence Against Women. 2001;7(8):900-926.

49. Carter-Edwards L, Fisher JT, Vaughn BJ, Svetkey LP. Church rosters: is this a viable mechanism for effectively recruiting African Americans for a community-based survey? Ethn Health. 2002;7(1):41-55.

50. Rankin J, Bhopal R. Understanding of heart disease and diabetes in a South Asian community: cross-sectional study testing the "snowball" sample method. Public Health. 2001;115(4):253-260.

51. Warner JP, Wright L, Blanchardx M, King M. The psychological health and quality of life of older lesbians and gay men: a snowball sampling pilot survey. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003;18(8):754-755.

52. Rosenwaike I. Surname analysis as a means of estimating minority elderly: an application using Asian surnames. Res Aging. 1994;16(2):212-227.

53. Himmelfarb HS, Loar RM, Mott SH. Sampling by ethnic surnames: the case of American Jews. Public Opin Q. 1983;47(2):247-260.

54. Shin EH, Yu EY. Use of surnames in ethnic research: the case of Kims in the Korean-American population. Demography. 1984;21(3):347-360.

55. Sasao T. Using surname-based telephone survey methodology in Asian-American communities: practical issues and caveats.J Community Psychol. 1994;22(4):283-295.

56. Stueve A, O'Donnell LN, Duran R, San Doval A, Blome J. Time-space sampling in minority communities: results with young Latino men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(6):922-926.

57. Wang Y, Ollendick TH. A cross-cultural and developmental analysis of self-esteem in Chinese and Western children. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2001;4(3):253-271.

58. Herdman M, Fox-Rushby J, Badia X. A model of equivalence in the cultural adaptation of HRQoL instruments: the universalistic approach. Qual Life Res. 1998;7(4):323-335.

59. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.

60. Si SX, Cullen JB. Response categories and potential cultural bias: effects of an explicit middle point in cross-cultural surveys. Int J Organ Analysis. 1998;6(3):218-231.

61. Hui CH, Triandis HC. Effects of culture and response format on extreme response style. J Cross Cult Psychol. 1989;20(3):296-309.

62. Johnson T, Kulesa P, Lic I, Cho YI, Shavitt S. The relation between culture and response styles: evidence from 19 countries. J Cross Cult Psychol. 2005;36(2):264-277.

63. Wheeler EL. Mental illness and social stigma: experiences in a Pakistani community in the UK. Gender Dev. 1998;6(1):37-43.

64. Santos HP Jr, Black AM, Sandelowski M. Timing of transition in cross-language qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2015;25(2):134-144.

65. Epstein J, Santo RM, Guillemin F. A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(4):435-441.

66. Waltz D, Strickland OL, Lenz E. Measurement in Nursing and Health Research. 5th ed. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company, LLC; 2016.

67. Maneesriwongul W, Dixon JK. Instrument translation process: a methods review. J Adv Nurs. 2004;48(2):175-186.

68. Van Widenfelt BM, Treffers PDA, De Beurs E, Siebelink BM, Koudijs E. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of assessment instruments used in psychological research with children and families. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2005;8(2):135-147.

69. Paniagua FA, Yamada AM. Handbook of Multicultural Mental Health: Assessment and Treatment of Diverse Populations. 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2013.

70. Jackson AP, Ivanoff A. Reduction of low response rates in interview surveys of poor African-American families. J Soc Serv Res. 1998;25(1):41-60.

71. Ibrahim S, Sidani S. Strategies to recruit minority persons: a systematic review. J Immigr Minor Health. 2014;16(5):882-888.

72. Thompson EE, Neighbors HW, Munday C, Jackson JS. Recruitment and retention of African American patients for clinical research: an exploration of response rates in an urban psychiatric hospital. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996;64(5):861-867.

73. Alegría M, Roter DL, Valentine A, et al. Patient-clinician ethnic concordance and communication in mental health intake visits. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;93(2):188-196.

74. Mier N, Medina AA, Bocanegra-Alonso A, Castillo-Ruiz O, Acosta-Gonzalez RI, Ramirez JA. Finding respondents from minority groups. J Res Pract. 2006;2(2):D2.

75. Oakley A, Wiggins M, Turner H, Rajan L, Barker M. Including culturally diverse samples in health research: a case study of an urban trial of social support. Ethn Health. 2003;8(1):29-39.

76. Fitzgerald T. Cross-cultural research principles and partnerships: experiences from New Zealand and Australia. Manage Educ. 2005;19(1):17-20.

77. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Child Welfare Information Gateway. Mandatory Reporters of Child Abuse and Neglect. Available at https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/manda.pdf. Last accessed February 15, 2024.

78. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. U.S. Public Health Service Syphilis Study in Tuskegee. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/Tuskegee. Last accessed February 15, 2024.

79. Reverby SM. Listening to narratives from the Tuskegee syphilis study. Lancet. 2011;377(9778):1646-1647.

80. Alvidrez J, Arean PA. Psychosocial treatment research with ethnic minority populations: ethical considerations in conducting clinical trials. Ethics Behav. 2002;12(1):103-116.

81. Corbie-Smith G, Thomas SB, Williams MV, Moody-Ayers S. Attitudes and beliefs of African Americans toward participation in medical research. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14(9):537-546.

82. Asai A, Ohnishi M, Nishigaki E, Sekimoto M, Fukuhara S, Fukui T. Focus group interviews examining attitudes towards medical research among the Japanese: a qualitative study. Bioethics. 2004;18(5):448-470.

83. Torres JM, Wallace SP. Migration circumstances, psychological distress, and self-rated physical health for Latino immigrants in the United States. Am J Pub Health. 2013;103(9):1619-1627.

84. Wendler D, Kington R, Madans J, Van Wye G, Christ-Schmidt H. Minority participation in health research—facts and fiction. PLoS Medicine. 2006;3(2):153-154.

85. Moreno-John G, Gachie A, Fleming CM, et al. Ethnic minority older adults participating in clinical research: developing trust. J Aging Health. 2004;16(5 suppl):93S-123S.

86. Corbie-Smith G, Ford CL. Distrust and poor self-reported health. Canaries in the coal mine? J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(4):395-397.

87. Fontes LA. Ethics in family violence research: cross-cultural issues. Fam Relat. 1998;47(1):53-61.

88. Hosokawa F. Building Trust: Doing Research to Understand Ethnic Communities. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books; 2010.

89. Palinkas LA, He AS, Choy-Brown M. Operationalizing social work science through research-practice partnerships: lessons from implementation science. Res Soc Work Pract. 2017;27(2):181-188.

90. Cheung M, Ma AK, Thyer BA, Webb AE. Research-practice integration in real practice settings: issues and suggestions. Res Soc Work Pract. 2015;25(4):523-530.

91. Tijssen RJW. Discarding the "basic science/applied science" dichotomy: a knowledge utilization triangle classification system of research journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology. 2010;61(9):1842-1852.

92. Ceci SJ. My journey from basic to applied to basic research: applied research benefits from theoretical training. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2011;25(4):673-674.

93. Boardman FK. Knowledge is power? The role of experiential knowledge in genetically "risky" reproductive decisions. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2014;36(1):137-150.

94. Chen Y. Development of a method for ontology-based empirical knowledge representation and reasoning. Decision Support Systems. 2010;50(1):1-20.

95. Yilmaz K. Comparison of quantitative and qualitative research traditions: epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. European Journal of Education. 2013;48(2):311-325.

96. Campbell R, Gregory KA, Patterson D, Bybee D. Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: an example of mixed methods research in community psychology. In: Lenard J, Glenwich D (eds). Methodological Approaches to Community-Based Research: Theory and Application. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2012: 51-68.

97. Hay C. Interpreting interpretivism interpreting interpretations: the new hermeneutics of public administration. Public Administration. 2011;89(1):167-182.

98. Swartz MK. Critical theory as a framework for academic nursing practice. Journal of Nursing Education. 2014;53(5):271-297.

99. Eagly AH, Riger S. Feminism and psychology: critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist. 2014;69(7):685-702.

100. Beckman LJ. Training in feminist research methodology: doing research on the margins. Women and Therapy. 2014;37(1-2):164-177.

101. Shavers VL, Klein WMP, Fagan P. Research on race/ethnicity and health care discrimination: where we are and where we need to go. American Journal of Public Health. 2012;102(5):930-932.

102. Agyeman J. Under-participation and ethnocentrism in environmental education research: developing culturally sensitive research approaches. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education. 2013;8(1):80-94.

103. Erkut S. Developing multiple language versions of instruments for intercultural research. Child Development Perspectives. 2010;4(1):19-24.

104. Burnette CE, Sanders S, Butcher HK, Rand JT. A toolkit for ethical and culturally sensitive research: an application with indigenous communities. Ethics & Social Welfare. 2014;8(4):364-382.

105. Thomas A. Focus groups in qualitative research: culturally sensitive methodology for the Arabian Gulf? International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2008;31(1):77-88.

106. Higginbottom GMA, Serrant-Green L. Developing culturally sensitive skills in health and social care with a focus on conducting research with African Caribbean communities in England. Qualitative Report. 2005;10(4):662-686.

107. Amer MM, Bagasra A. Psychological research with Muslim Americans in the age of Islamophobia: trends, challenges, and recommendations. American Psychologist. 2013;68(3):134-144.

108. Hoppit T, Shah S, Bradburn P, et al. Reaching the "hard to reach:" strategies to recruit black and minority ethnic service users with rare long-term neurological conditions. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2012;15(6):485-495.

109. Mechanic M, Pole N. Methodological considerations in conducting ethnocultrally sensitive research on intimate partner abuse and its multidimensional consequences. Sex Roles. 2013;69(3/4):205-225.

110. Hoopman R, Terwee CB, Muller MJ, et al. Methodological challenges in quality of life research among Turkish and Moroccan ethnic minority cancer patients: translation, recruitment and ethical issues. Ethnicity & Health. 2009;14(3):237-253.

111. Arffman I. Problems and issues in translating international educational achievement tests. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. 2013;32(2):2-14.

112. Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2011;17(2):268-274.

113. George S, Duran N, Norris K. A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders Americans. Journal of Public Health. 2014;104(2):e16-e31.

114. White J, Yuan N, Cook S, Abbey A. Ethnic minority women's experiences with intimate partner violence: using community-based participatory research to ask the right questions. Sex Roles. 2013;69(3/4):226-236.

115. Culley L, Hudson N, Rapport F. Using focus groups with minority ethnic communities: researching infertility in British South Asian communities. Qualitative Health Research. 2007;17(1):102-112.

116. Gyure ME, Quillin JM, Rodríguez VM, et al. Practical considerations for implementing research recruitment etiquette. IRB: Ethics & Human Research. 2014;36(6):7-12.

117. Ruiz-Casares M. Research ethics in global mental health: advancing culturally responsive mental health research. Transcultural Psychiatry. 2014;51(6):790-805.

118. Rashad AM, MacVane PF, Haith-Cooper M. Obtaining informed consent in an Egyptian research study. Nursing Ethics. 2004;11(4):394-399.

119. Lloyd CE, Johnson MR, Mughal S, et al. Securing recruitment and obtaining informed consent in minority ethnic groups in the UK. BMC Health Services Research. 2008;8:68.

120. Vallely A, Lees S, Shagi C, et al. How informed is consent in vulnerable populations? Experience using a continuous consent process during the MDP301 vaginal microbicide trial in Mwanza, Tanzania. BMC Medical Ethics. 2010;11:1-12.

121. DuBois JM. Ethics in Mental Health Research: Principles, Guidance, and Cases. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2008.

122. Salois EM, Holkup PA. Research as spiritual covenant. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 2006;28(5):505-563.

123. U.S. Census Bureau. Demographic Turning Points for the United States: Population Projections for 2020 to 2060. Available at https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2020/demo/p25-1144.pdf. Last accessed February 15, 2024.

124. Austin MJ, Isokuortti N. A framework for teaching practice-based research with a focus on service users. J Teach Soc Work. 2016;36(1):11-32.

125. Williams I, Glasby J. Making "what works" work: the use of knowledge in UK health and social care decision-making. Policy Soc. 2010;29(2):95-102.

126. Rajack-Talley TA, Best L, Smith SE, et al. Epistemological inclusiveness in researching the African American community. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2017;20(4):411-423.

127. Salas LM, Sen S, Segal EA. Critical theory: pathway from dichotomous to integrated social work practice. Fam Soc. 2010;91(1): 91-96.

128. Gray M, Agllias K, Schubert L, Boddy J. Doctoral research from a feminist perspective: acknowledging, advancing and aligning women's experience. Qual Soc Work. 2015;14(6):758-775.

129. Caputo R, Epstein W, Stoesz D, Thyer B. Postmodernism: a dead end in social work epistemology. J Soc Work Educ. 2015;51(4):638-647.

130. Hodge DR, Derezotes DS. Postmodernism and spirituality: some pedagogical implications for teaching content on spirituality. J Soc Work Educ. 2008;44(1):103-123.

131. Hansen JT. The relevance of postmodernism to counselors and counseling practice. J Ment Health Couns. 2015;37(4):355-363.

132. Patel SG, Tabb K, Sue S. Diversity, multiculturalism, and inclusion. In: Bond MA, Serrano-García I, Keys CB, Shinn M (eds). APA Handbook of Community Psychology: Theoretical Foundations, Core Concepts, and Emerging Challenges. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association; 2017: 253-273.

133. Rao MA, Donaldson SI. Expanding opportunities for diversity in positive psychology: an examination of gender, race, and ethnicity. Can Psychol. 2015;56(3):271-282.

134. Henshaw EJ. Exploring cultural competency in clinical research through historical reports. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Psychological Association; Toronto, Canada; August 6-9, 2015.

135. Nguyen KH, Pasick RJ, Stewart SL, Kerlikowske K, Karliner LS. Disparities in abnormal mammogram follow-up time for Asian women compared with non-Hispanic white women and between Asian ethnic groups. Cancer. 2017;123(18):3468-3475.

136. Trafimow D, Osman M. Barriers to converting applied social psychology to bettering the human condition. Basic & Applied Social Psychology. 2022;44(1):1-11.

137. Mwachofi AK. Building trust and collaboration with rural minorities: experiences with minority farmers in the Mississippi Delta.J Health Dispar Res Pract. 2012;5(2):62-80.

138. Casado BL, Negi NJ, Hong M. Culturally competent social work research: methodological considerations for research with language minorities. Soc Work. 2012;57(1):1-10.

139. Harley D, Hunn V, Elliott W, Canfield J. Photovoice as a culturally competent research methodology for African Americans. Journal of Pan African Studies. 2015;7(9):31-40.

140. Walters KL, Simoni JM, Evans-Campbell T, et al. Mentoring the mentors of underrepresented racial/ethnic minorities who are conducting HIV research: beyond cultural competency. AIDS Behav. 2016;20(Suppl 2):S288-S293.

141. Li W, Tsoh JY. Recruiting and retaining Chinese elders in a longitudinal study. J Transcult Nurs. 2017;28(1):63-69.

142. Díaz Y, Denner J, Ortiz E. Critical methods in longitudinal research with Latino immigrant families. Hisp J Behav Sci. 2017;39(2):150-168.

143. Im E, Kim S, Chee W, et al. Practical issues in multi-lingual research. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;54:141-149.

144. Regnault A, Herdman M. Using quantitative methods within the Universalist model framework to explore the cross-cultural equivalence of patient-reported outcome instruments. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(1):115-124.

145. Ali MM. Are we asking the same questions in different contexts: translation techniques in cross-culture studies in science education? Journal of Turkish Science Education. 2016;13(1):31-44.

146. Stennis KB, Purnell K, Perkins E, Fischle H. Lessons learned: conducting culturally competent research and providing interventions with Black churches. Social Work and Christianity. 2015;42(3):332-349.

147. Zhang N, Davis RE, Caldwell CH, et al. Ethnic identity, questionnaire content, and the dilemma of race matching in surveys of African Americans by African American interviewers. Field Methods. 2013;25(2):142-161.

148. Chan DNS, So WKW. Strategies for recruiting South Asian women to cancer screening research and the lessons learned. J Adv Nurs. 2016;72(11):2937-2946.

149. Pashea JJ, Kochel TR. Face-to-face Surveys in high crime areas: balancing respondent cooperation and interviewer safety. Journal of Criminal Justice Education. 2016;27(1):95-120.

150. Freimuth VS, Jamison AM, An J, Hancock GR, Quinn SC. Determinants of trust in the flu vaccine for African Americans and Whites. Soc Sci Med. 2017;193:70-79.

151. Quay TA, Frimer L, Janssen PA, Lamers Y. Barriers and facilitators to recruitment of South Asians to health research: a scoping review. BMJ Open. 2017;7(5):e014889.

152. McLaughlin R, Alfaro-Velcamp T. The vulnerability of immigrants in research: enhancing protocol development and ethics review.J Acad Ethics. 2015;13(1):27-43.

153. Nielsen M, Haun D, Kärtner J, Legare CH. The persistent sampling bias in developmental psychology: a call to action. J Exp Child Psychol. 2017;162:31-38.

154. Salma J, Ogilvie L, Keating N, Hunter KF. A bicultural researcher's reflections on ethical research practices with Muslim immigrant women: merging boundaries and challenging binaries. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2017;40(2):109-121.

155. Fischer R, Poortinga YH. Addressing methodological challenges in culture-comparative research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2018;49(5):691-712.

156. Reinerman-Jones L, Lackey S. Basic versus applied research: the final episode! Next season: transfer! Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. 2011;12(5):395-396.

157. Kankam PK. The use of paradigms in information research. Library & Information Science Research. 2019;41(2):8592.

158. Kekeya J. The commonalities and differences between research paradigms. Contemporary PNG Studies. 2019;31:26-36.

159. Sharma M. Applying feminist theory to medical education. Lancet. 2019;393(10171):570-578.

160. Rosa WE. Healthcare decision-making of African-American patients: comparing positivist and postmodern approaches to care. Nursing Science Quarterly. 2019;32(2):140-147.

161. Sabatello M. Cultivating inclusivity in precision medicine research: disability, diversity, and cultural competence. Journal of Community Genetics. 2019;10(3):363-373.

162. Flores LY, Martinez LD, McGillen GG, Milord J. Something old and something new: future directions in vocational research with people of color in the United States. Journal of Career Assessment. 2019;27(2):187-208.

163. Woo B, Figuereo V, Rosales R, Wang K, Sabur K. Where is race and ethnicity in social work? A content analysis. Social Work Research. 2018;42(3):180-186.

164. Corley NA, Young SM. Is social work still racist? A content analysis of recent literature. Social Work. 2018;63(4):317-326.

165. Pelzang R, Hutchinson AM. Establishing cultural integrity in qualitative research: reflections from a cross-cultural study. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2018;17(1):1-9.

166. Burlew AK, Peteet BJ, McCuistian C, Miller-Roenigk BD. Best practices for researching diverse groups. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 2019;89(3):354-368.

167. Hall GCN, Yip T, Zárate MA. On becoming multicultural in a monocultural research world: a conceptual approach to studying ethnocultural diversity. American Psychologist. 2019;71:40-51.

168. Otado J, Kwagyan J, Edwards D, Ukaegbu A, Rockcliffe F, Osafo N. Culturally competent strategies for recruitment and retention of African American populations into clinical trials. Clinical Translation of Science. 2015;8(5):460-466.

169. Randolph S, Coakley T, Shears J. Recruiting and engaging African-American men in health research. Nurse Researcher. 2018;26(1):8-12.

170. Tan TX, Yi Z, Kim E, Li Z, Cheng K. Linguistic equivalence, construct validity, but lack measurement invariance: an illustration of challenges in cross-cultural research on adolescent adjustment. Cross-Cultural Research. 2020;54(4):323-345.

171. Behr D, Sha M. Introduction: translation of questionnaires in cross-national and cross-cultural research. Translation and Interpreting. 2019;10(2):1-4.

172. Sharma A, Pachori H, Das B, Unni D. Methodological rigour in translating instruments: an overlooked yet essential aspect in cross-cultural research. Asian Journal of Psychiatry. 2020;52.

173. Mizuno M, Sugimoto K, Mayers T, Ferrans C. Ensuring cultural and cognitive integrity in instrument translation: quality of life index for Japanese cancer patients. Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2019;6(1):64-71.

174. Katigbak C, Foley M, Robert L, Hutchinson MK. Experiences and lessons learned in using community-based participatory research to recruit Asian American immigrant research participants. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2016;48(2):210-218.

175. Leong FTL, Lyons B. Ethical challenges for cross-cultural research conducted by psychologists from the United States. Ethics and Behavior. 2010;20(3-4):250-264.

176. Mindlis I, Livert D, Federman AD, Wisnivesky JP, Revenson TA. Racial/ethnic concordance between patients and researchers as a predictor of study attrition. Social Sciences and Medicine. 2020;255.

177. Taani MH, Zabler B, Fendrich M, Schiffman R. Lessons learned for recruitment and retention of low-income African Americans. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications. 2020;17.

178. Ozano K, Khatri R. Reflexivity, positionality and power in cross-cultural participatory action research with research assistants in rural Cambodia. Educational Action Research. 2018;26(2):190-204.

179. Rosemberg MA, Boutain DM, Mohammed SA. Transnationalism: a framework for advancing nursing research with contemporary immigrants. Advances in Nursing Science. 2014;39(1):E19-E28.

180. Halkoaho A, Pietilä AM, Ebbesen M, Karki S, Kangasniemi M. Cultural aspects related to informed consent in health research: a systematic review. Nursing Ethics. 2016;23(6):698-712.

181. Honan E, Hamid MO, Alhamdan B. Ethical issues in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2013;36(4):386-399.

182. Green BN, Johnson CD. Interprofessional collaboration in research, education, and clinical practice: working together for a better future. Journal of Chiropractic Education. 2015;29(1):1-10.

183. Gee BM, Devine N, Aubuchon-Endsley NL, Brumley M, Ramsdell-Hudock HL, Swann HE. The reciprocity team: development of an interprofessional research collaboration. Journal of Allied Health. 2017;46(2):e43-e49.

184. Delman J, Progovac AM, Flomenhoft T, Delman D, Chambers V, Le Cook B. Barriers and facilitators to community-based participatory mental health care research for racial and ethnic minorities. Health Affairs. 2019;38(3):391-398.

185. Ellaway RH, Hecker KG. What role does basic research have in an applied field? Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice. 2022;27(2):289-292.

186. Lykins T. Empirical Knowledge: What It Is, Features, and Types, Meanings. Available at https://fischerinstitute.com/empirical-knowledge-what-it-is-features-and-types-meanings/#Empirical_knowledge_Characteristics. Last accessed February 15, 2024.

187. Al-Ababneh MM. Linking ontology, epistemology and research methodology. Science & Philosophy. 2020;8(1):75-91.

188. Mofitt U, Katsiaficas D, Ghavami N, Minor I, Padilla D, Rogers LO. Intersectionality and identity: a systematic review and qualitative analysis of U.S. research in psychological science. Identity. 2023;23(4):288-313.

189. Junjie M, Yingxin M. The discussions of positivism and interpretivism. Global Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2022;4(1):10-14.

190. Sikka T. Barriers to access: a feminist analysis of medically assisted dying and the experience of marginalized groups. Omega. 2021;84(1):4-27.

191. Stewart GT, St. Pierre E, Devine N, Kirloskar-Steinbach M. The end of the dream: postmodernism and qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry. 2021;27(8/9):1051-1058.

192. Holtz P. Does postmodernism really entail a disregard for the truth? Similarities and differences in postmodern and critical rationalist conceptualizations of truth, progress, and empirical research methods. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020;11.

193. Raghav K, Anand S, Gothwal A, et al. Underreporting of race/ethnicity in COVID-19 research. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2021;108:419-421.

194. Mena JS, Cook NE, Quina K. Multicultural considerations in the psychology research methods course. In: Mena JA, Quina K (eds). Integrating Multiculturalism and Intersectionality into the Psychology Curriculum: Strategies for Instructors. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2019: 260-280.

195. Sharma J, McDonald CP, Bledsoe KG, et al. Intersectionality in research: call for inclusive, decolonized, and culturally sensitive research designs in counselor education. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation. 2021;12(2):63-72.

196. Colón-Aguirre M, Bright K. Incorporating diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) into research. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science. 2022;63(3):237-244.

197. Massoud MF. The price of positionality: assessing the benefits and burdens of self‐identification in research methods. Journal of Law & Society. 2022;49:S64-S86.

198. La Scala S, Mullins JL, First RB, Michalska JA. Equity, diversity, and inclusion in developmental neuroscience: practical lessons from community-based participatory research. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience. 2023;16.

199. Mfoafo-M'Carthy M, Grischow J. Hierarchy and inequality in research: navigating the challenges of research in Ghana. Qualitative Research. 2022;22(5):729-742.

200. Chan CD, Henesy RK, Erby AN. Toward praxis, promise, and futures of intersectionality in multimethod counseling research. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation. 2019;10(1):12-18.

201. Harb CA, Taylor MJ. The utility of community-based participatory research: Increasing research engagement among minoritized ethnoracial groups. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 2023; [Epub ahead of print].

202. O'Brien J, Fossey E, Palmer VJ. A scoping review of the use of co‐design methods with culturally and linguistically diverse communities to improve or adapt mental health services. Health & Social Care in the Community. 2021;29(1):1-17.

203. Chen L, Tse HW, Wu D, Young M-E. Cross-cultural researchers' positionality in immigrant health research: reflections on conducting research on Chinese immigrants' experiences in the United States. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2021;20.

204. Davis RE, Johnson TP, Lee S, Werner C. Why do Latino survey respondents acquiesce? Respondent and interviewer characteristics as determinants of cultural patterns of acquiescence among Latino survey respondents. Cross-Cultural Research. 2019;53(1):87-115.

205. de Wet A, Dowling T, Swartz L, et al. Complexities in the process of translating research documents in cross-cultural settings. Global Public Health. 2020;15(6):818-827.

206. Matsumoto D, van de Vijver FJR. Cross-cultural research methods. In: Cooper H, Coutanche MN, McMullen LM, Panter AT, Rindskopf D, Sher KJ (eds). APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology: Foundations, Planning, Measures, and Psychometrics. Vol. 1, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2023: 97-113.

207. Henderson C, Scott T, Schinder B, et al. Shifting the paradigm from participant mistrust to researcher and institutional trustworthiness: a qualitative study of researchers' perspectives on building trustworthiness with Black communities. Community Health Equity Research & Policy. 2024;44(2):127-136.

208. Wright KO, Deal B-E, Harrison TR, Malova E, Jia X, Morgan SE. Examining uncertainty management in the clinical trial experiences of African American and Black Caribbean participants and the coordinators who recruit them. Qualitative Research in Health. 2023;3:100231.

209. Eliacin J, Polsinelli AJ, Epperson F, et al. Barriers and facilitators to participating in Alzheimer's disease biomarker research in black and white older adults. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2023;9(2):1-15.

210. Dai Y. "Chameleonization" in the folds of culture: a comparative analysis of cross-cultural qualitative fieldwork. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2023;22:1-14.