1. Herrman JW. Keeping their attention: innovative strategies for nursing education. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2011;42(10):449-456.
2. Karge BD, Phillips KM, Jessee T, McCabe M. Effective strategies for engaging adult learners. J Coll Teach Learn. 2011;8(12):53-56.
3. Hilty DM, Benjamin S, Briscoe G, et al. APA summit on medical student education task force on informatics and technology: steps to enhance the use of technology in education through faculty development, funding and change management. Acad Psychiatr. 2006;30(6):444-450.
4. Wass V, Richards T, Cantillon P. Monitoring the medical education revolution: the impact of new training programmes must be evaluated. BMJ. 2003;327:1393.
5. Souza KH, Kamin C, O'Sullivan P, Moses A, Heestand D. Organizational models of educational technology in U.S. and Canadian medical schools. Acad Med. 2008;83(7):691-699.
6. Pan SC, Franklin T. In-service teachers' self-efficacy, professional development, and web 2.0 tools for integration. New Horizons Educ. 2011;59(3):28-40.
7. Vogt M, Schaffner B, Ribar A, Chavez R. The impact of podcasting on the learning and satisfaction of undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Educ Pract. 2010;10(1):38-42.
8. Seaman JE, Seaman J. Distance Education State Almanac, 2019. Available at https://www.bayviewanalytics.com/reports/almanac/national_almanac2019.pdf. Last accessed September 23, 2024.
9. Groff J, Mouza C. A framework for addressing challenges to classroom technology use. AACE. 2008;16(1):21-46.
10. Sangrà A, Vlachopoulos D, Cabrera N. Building an inclusive definition of e-learning: an approach to the conceptual framework. Int Rev Res Open Distributed Learning. 2012;13(2).
11. Santally MI, Rajabalee Y, Cooshna-Naik D. Learning design implementation for distance e-learning: blending rapid e-learning techniques with activity-based pedagogies to design and implement a socio-constructivist environment. Eur J Open Distance E-Learning. 2012;1-14.
12. Avillion A, Holtschneider ME, Puetz LR. Innovation in Nursing Staff Development: Teaching Strategies to Enhance Learner Outcomes. Marblehead, MA: HCPro, Inc; 2010.
13. Songhao H, Takashi-Maeda KS, Kubo T. Evolution from collaborative learning to symbiotic e-learning: creation of new e-learning environment for knowledge society. US-China Educ Rev. 2011;8(1):46-53.
14. McGee JB, Kanter SL. How we develop and sustain innovation in medical education technology: keys to success. Med Teach. 2011;33:279-285.
15. MGH Institute of Health Professions. Integrating Technology in Health Professions Education: Trends and Innovations. Available at https://www.mghihp.edu/news-and-more/opinions/health-professions-education-effects/integrating-technology-health-professions-education-trends-and-innovations#. Last accessed September 23, 2024.
16. Caring Support. Incorporating New Technologn in Healthcare Education. Available at https://www.caringsupport.com/blog/incorporating-technology-in-healthcare-education. Last accessed September 23, 2024.
17. Los Angeles Pacific University. Tech in Health Sciences Education: AI, Simulators, and More. Available at https://www.lapu.edu/technology-health-sciences-education/. Last accessed September 23, 2024.
18. American Heart Association. Basic Life Support for Healthcare Providers. Available at https://cpr.heart.org/en/cpr-courses-and-kits/healthcare-professional/basic-life-support-bls-training. Last accessed September 23, 2024.
19. O'Reilly T. What is Web 2.0? Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Available at https://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html. Last accessed September 23, 2024.
20. Tunks KW. An introduction and guide to enhancing online instruction with web 2.0 tools. J Educators Online. 2012;9(2):1.
21. Syers K. Using Web 2.0 Tools to Engage Learners. Available at https://ofe.ecu.edu/udlmodules/modules/using-web-2-0-tools-to-engage-learners/. Last accessed September 23, 2024.
22. O'Bannon B, Britt V. Creating/developing/using a wiki study guide: effects on student achievement. J Res Technol Educ. 2012;44(4):293-312.
23. Lehman R, Conceicao S. Creating a Sense of Presence in Online Teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2010.
24. Yoo S, Huang W. Comparison of web 2.0 technology acceptance level based on cultural differences. Educ Technol Soc. 2011;14(4):241-252.
25. Hew KF, Cheung WS. Use of web 2.0 technologies in K-12 and higher education: the search for evidenced-based practice. Educ Res Rev. 2013;9:47-64.
26. Grosseck G. To use or not to use web 2.0 in higher education? Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2009;1(1):478-482.
27. Kamerer JL, Brophy FT, Corvino JA. SLIM: blending technologies to create better learning experiences. J Nurs Regul. 2011;2(2):47-50.
28. McCabe DE, Gilmartin MJ, Goldsamt LA. Student self-confidence with clinical nursing competencies in a high-dose simulation clinical teaching model. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2016;6(8):52-58.
29. Jeffries P. A framework for designing, implementing, and evaluating simulations used as teaching strategies in nursing. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2005;26(2):96-103.
30. Oermann MH, Shellenbarger T, Gaberson KB. Clinical Teaching Strategies in Nursing. 5th ed. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company; 2018.
31. Hayden JK, Smiley RA, Alexander M, Kardong-Edgren S, Jeffries PR. The NCSBN National Simulation Study: a longitudinal, randomized, controlled study replacing clinical hours with simulation in prelicensure nursing education. J Nurs Reg. 2014;5(2Suppl):S1-S64.
33. Mayville ML. Debriefing: essential step in simulation. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 2011;11(1):35-39.
34. Chan KS, Zary N. Applications and challenges of implementing artificial intelligence in medical education: integrative review. JMIR Med Educ. 2019;5:0.
35. Sapci AH, Sapci HA. Artificial intelligence education and tools for medical and health informatics students: systematic review. JMIR Med Educ. 2020:6:0.
36. Narayanan, S, Ramakrishnan R, Durairaj E, Das A. Artificial intelligence revolutionizing the field of medical education. Cureus. 2023;15(11):e49604.
37. Sallam H. ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11:887.
38. Ghorashi N, Ismail A, Ghosh P, Sidawy A, javan R. AI-powered chatbots in medical education: potential applications and implications. Cureus. 2023;15(8):e43271.
39. Randhawa GK, Jackson . The role of artificial intelligence in learning and professional development for healthcare professionals. Healthc Manage Forum. 2020;33:19-24.
40. El Saadawi GM, Tseytlin E, Legowski E, et al. A natural language intelligent tutoring system for training pathologists: implementation and evaluation. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008;13:709-722.
41. Kononowicz AA, Woodham LA, Edelbring S, et al. Virtual patient simulations in health professions education: systematic review and meta-analysis by the digital health education collaboration. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21:0.
42. Miller M, Hartung SQ. Evidence-based clicker use: audience response systems for rehabilitation nurses. Rehab Nurs. 2012;37(3):151-159.
43. DiVall MV, Hayney MS, Marsh W, et al. Perceptions of pharmacology students, faculty members, and administrators on the use of technology in the classroom. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013;77(4):1-7.
44. Tregonning AM, Doherty DA, Hornbuckle J, Dickinson JE. The audience response system and knowledge gain: a prospective study. Med Teach. 2010;34(4):e269-274.
45. Lee ST, Dapremont JA. Engaging nursing students through integration of the audience response system. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2012;33(1):55-57.
46. Sullivan R. Principles for constructing good clicker questions: going beyond rote learning and stimulating active engagement with course content. J Educ Technol Syst. 2009;37(3):335-347.
47. Woodring BC, Hultquist BL. Using lecture in active classrooms. In: Bradshaw MJ, Hultquist BL (eds). Innovative Teaching Strategies in Nursing and Related Health Professions. 7th ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2017: 143-162.
48. Coman L, Solomon P. Problem-based learning. In: Bradshaw MJ, Hultquist BL (eds). Innovative Teaching Strategies in Nursing and Related Health Professions. 7th ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2017: 179-188.
49. Echeverri JF, Sadler TD. Gaming as a platform for the development of innovative problem-based learning opportunities. Science Educator. 2011;20(1):44-48.
50. Hodges HF. Preparing new nurses with complexity science and problem-based learning. J Nurs Educ. 2011;50(1):7-13.
51. Yu D, Zhang Y, Xu Y, Wu J, Wang C. Improvement in critical thinking dispositions of undergraduate nursing students through problem-based learning: a crossover-experiment. J Nurs Educ. 2013;52(10):574-581.
52. Meo SA. Evaluating learning among undergraduate medical students in schools with traditional and problem-based curricula. Adv Physiol Educ. 2013;37(3):249-253.
53. McFalls M. Integration of problem-based learning and innovative technology into self-care course. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013;77(6): 1-5.
54. Rowe M, Frantz J, Bozalek V. The role of blended learning in the clinical education of healthcare students: a systematic review. Med Teach. 2010;34:e216-e221.
55. Garrison DR, Kanuka H. Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet Higher Educ. 2004;7(2):95-105.
56. Jonas D, Burns B. The transition to blended e-learning: changing the focus of educational delivery in children's pain management. Nurse Educ Pract. 2010;10(1):1-7.
57. Lewin LO, Singh M, Bateman BL, Glover PB. Improving education in primary care: development of an online curriculum using the blended learning model. BMC Med Educ. 2009;9:33.
58. Lehmann R, Bosse HM, Simon A, Nikendei C, Huwendiek S. An innovative blended learning approach using virtual patients as preparation for skills laboratory training: perceptions of students and tutors. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13(23):1-9.
59. Jaffe L. Games are multidimensional in educational situations. In: Bradshaw MJ, Hultquist BL (eds). Innovative Teaching Strategies in Nursing and Related Health Professions. 7th ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2017: 199-210.
60. Fabricatore C, Lopez X. Sustainability learning through gaming: an exploratory study. EJEL. 2012;10(2):209-222.
61. van Gaalen AEJ, Brouwer J, Schonrock-Adema J, et al. Gamification of health professions education: a systematic review. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2021;26(2):683-711.
62. Ribeiro LA, da Silva TL, Mussi AQ. Gamification: a methodology to motivate engagement and participation in a higher education environment. Inter J Educ Res. 2018;6:249-264.
63. Armstrong MB, Landers RN, Gamification of employee training and devel opment. Int J Training Dev. 2018;22(2):162-169.
64. Mullet JH, Akerson NM, Turman A. Healing the past through story. Adult Learning. 2013;24(2):72-78.
65. Willis P. Scheherazade's secret: the power of stories and the desire to learn. Aust J Adult Learn. 2011;51:110-122.
66. Clarke LE, de Jong JD. The value of story in medicine and medical education: a chance to reflect. J Learning through the Arts. 2012;8(1):1-16.
68. Hustad E, Arntzen AAB. Facilitating teaching and learning capabilities in social learning management systems: challenges, issues and implications for design. J Integr Des Process Sci. 2013;17(1):17-35.
69. Razak NA, Saeed M, Ahmad Z. Adopting Social Networking Sites (SNSs) as interactive communities among English Foreign Language (EFL) learners in writing: opportunities and challenges. English Lang Teaching. 2013;6(11):187-198.
70. American Nurses Association. Social Media. Available at https://www.nursingworld.org/social. Last accessed September 23, 2024.
71. Jackson J, Fraser R, Ash P. Social media and nurses: insights for promoting health for individual and professional use. Online J Issues Nurs. 2014;19(3):2.
72. Lowenstein AJ. Strategies for innovation. In: Bradshaw MJ, Hultquist BL (eds). Innovative Teaching Strategies in Nursing and Related Health Professions. 7th ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2017: 59-70.
73. Huxley A. Brave New World and Brave New World Revisited. New York, NY: Harper Perennial Modern Classics; 2005.
74. Clark-Wilson A. Approaches to in-service teacher development in England and Wales concerning the use of technology in secondary mathematics. Teach Math Appl. 2009;28:208-211.
75. Bourbonnais FF. Transitioning a master's of nursing course from campus to on-line delivery: lessons learned. Nurse Educ Pract. 2010;10(4):201-204.
76. Gregory JL. Lecture is not a dirty word, how to use active lecture to increase student engagement. HIGH. 2013;2(4):116-122.
77. Handal B, Cavanagh M, Wood L, Petocz P. Factors learning to the adoption of learning technology: the case of graphic calculators. Australasian J Educ Tech. 2011;27(2):343-360.
78. Simon D, Jackson K, Maxwell K. Traditional versus online instruction: faculty resources impact strategies for course delivery. Business Educ Accreditation. 2013;5(1):107-116.
79. Brooks CF. Toward "hybridized" faculty development for the twenty-first century: blending online communities of practice and face-to-face meetings in instructional and professional support programmes. Innov Educ Teach Int. 2010;47(3):261-270.
80. Hertz MB. Mentoring and Coaching for Effective Tech Integration. Available at https://www.edutopia.org/blog/mentoring-coaching-tech-integration-mary-beth-hertz. Last accessed September 23, 2024.
81. Hasson C, Cornelius F, Suplee PD. A technology-driven nursing faculty resource center. Nurse Educ. 2008;33(1):22-25.
82. Davis KJ. Exploring virtual PLCs: professional development for the busy practitioner. Perspect School-Based Issues. 2013;14(2):28-32.
83. Risling T, Ferguson L. Communities of practice in nursing academia: a growing need to practice what we teach. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2013;10(1):1-8.
84. Burke KM, Craig C. The dedicated education unit: innovating within the regulatory framework. J Nurs Reg. 2011;1(4):9-12.
Mention of commercial products does not indicate endorsement.